VinoCritic.com
                                                                                        The web's leading source for free unbiased wine reviews.

                  Archives (and
Reader Blogs):  Your turn to rate the wines

Please also click here to visit our main web site for in-depth analysis of our recent wines of the week, special events,  and wine-scene news from San Diego and  beyond.

Robert Mondavi Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon 2002

Print the article

This entry was posted on 2/8/2006 8:26 PM and is filed under California Cabernets, good value wines.

I have been a fan of Robert Mondavi Winery for quite some time.  It's a shame that the Mondavi family no longer has any connection to the winery that bears their name, having sold their company to the Constellation Beverage Company towards the end of 2005.  The next few vingtages will be the last that have the "Mondavi hand" involved in the production of the wine.  Any student of California wine will know that Robert Mondavi has done more than any other single individual to push the quality of California wine in a positive direction over the last 40 years.  As he got older, however, he turned the reigns over to his sons, Tim (winemaker), and Michael (chariman of the board).  Daughter Marcia was also on the board of directors.  Many would argue that the children let the quality slip, and the winery lost some of its luster the last few years.  The winery got too big, and started producing "value wines" that diluted the brand's prestige.  The winery seemed to lose its focus on their high quality Napa flagship wines.  From a business standpoint, the "value wines" (Woodbridge, Mondavi Coastal, Mondavi Private Selection) made a lot more money than the "flagship wines" (Robert Mondavi Winery Napa Valley, and Robert Mondavi Reserve).  Perhaps this is why the flagship wines did not get the attention that they used to enjoy in the days when Robert Mondavi himself ran the show, and stuck just to the quality wines as opposed to the high volume value wines.  It just goes to show that in the end, especially if your company goes public, t's all about the money.
   Having said all that, the Robert Mondavi Napa Valley Cabs seemed to have returned triumphantly to their old form the last 2 vintages.  They remind me of the time when Jack Nicklaus won the Masters long after everyone thought he was too old to compete any more.  The 2001 and 2002 were both excellent.  They retail for about $25, and can often times be found at the discount stores for under $20.00.  The Mondavi Winery Napa Cabs can be found at just about any supermarket or wine shop.  Both these wines have a strong nose of blackberry with a hint of wet earth and truffles.  The strong tannins are well enough integrated that you can drink the wine now.  Both wines have enough fruit to satisfy most palates.  I did not like the 2001 when first released a year ago (tannins too dry), but it drinks beautifully now.  The 2002 drank well from the get go.  They both have a nice finish.
   I'm glad that the Mondavi's are ending their 40 year reign at the winery on a good note.  I give the 2001 3.5 stars, and the 2002 just a smidgen short of 4 stars.  For the price, they represent a "gold medal value".

Thanks for the memories, Mr Mondavi.

Readers, please log on and give your opinionon these wines!
 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

    • 2/9/2006 5:49 PM Rawli wrote:
      Mr. Vinocritic I could not agree more with your assessment of the Mondavi. I was a wine snob for such a long time and stayed away from the Mondavi brand preferring the likes of Heitz ans Silver Oak. A friend of mine suggested that I expand my pallette and suggested Mondavi. I have been a fan ever since.
      I have been lucky enough to taste some 1984's and 1987's. While they are superior to the 2001 and 2002's the value for the recent vintages make them a great tasting everyday wine. I now alway have a couple of bottles of Mondavi on hand and would proudly serve it on any occasion.
      Thanks Vinocritic and keep up the good work.
      Reply to this
      1. 2/9/2006 10:05 PM VinoCritic wrote:
        Hmm.  1984 and 1987, huh.  If you drank these recently, which I  assume from your e-mail, you are talking about 20 year old Mondavi.  Not many California wines last 20 years, so it just goes to show that Mondavi was doing it right long before the newbies came along with new wineries and fancy marketing.  But please clarify.  Was this the regular Mondavi, or the more expensive Mondavi Reserve? 
        Reply to this
        1. 2/11/2006 11:58 AM Rawli wrote:
          Ahh yes you are right again Vinocritic it was the Reserve Mondavi.
          Reply to this
    • 11/29/2006 12:19 AM alex cornivus wrote:
      I think it even hasn?t pulled the oak, alcohol, acids, tannins and fruit together into a seamless package. The individual parts stick out, nakedly, yet possess an innate balance.
      Reply to this
    • 1/5/2007 12:10 PM Prince wrote:
      one thing more I saggeust the blog owner make some more blogs like this . so we get more info on it. This is say very great way to learn any thing or if u don’t have knowlage but some thing than u just ask a Quession and u well get a anwser. Its simple great.
      Reply to this
    • 5/1/2007 11:08 AM Angeline Julie wrote:
      I am glad to post my views and points in this blog, but I must say that webmaster of this blog has done a very great job to make his blog more informative and more discussable but unfortunately everthing is same here that more than 80% in this and other blogs post their comments for making spam!!!, so i will really all this spam links to google band tool, because webmaster makes blogs for making discuss and for sloving each other problems. thanks http://www.gordoniihoodia.net
      Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.